Tag Archives: socialreporting

The sociable role of social reporters

What are social reporters, and what do they do?

Do you see yourself as one?

A London Net Tuesday event earlier this week gave me confidence that those are questions worth asking, even if the answers are ones we still have to choose for ourselves.

The term socialreporter was one I came up with a few years back, when I got tired to saying I was a sort of old journalist, turned consultant in partnerships and facilitation, who got excited about social technologies some years back.

I haven’t promoted it strongly, because it isn’t meant to be a personal brand or very well-defined, so I’ve been delighted when other think it has some use.

William Wardlaw Rogers thought it interesting enough to make it the theme of this month’s Net Tuesday, so I dug out a Mindmap I started last year, added another, and used that to spark some lively conversation with a group including John Popham, Fiona McElroy, and Mark Barratt. I think we agreed that social reporters should be sociable – as in socially useful. read more »

More buzz around Local 2.0

Another boost to the growing interest in using social media for local communication and action, with a report from Kevin Harris on Simon Grice’s Hyperlocal *mashup workshop, which he helped facilitate. Kevin did a lot of early work on digital inclusion and local online centres in the Web 1.0 world, and knows both about technology and neighbourhoods. This time around there are lots more commercial interests, though Kevin reports:

But at the end of it I found it hard to believe that any of the companies represented, large or small, has a commercial model that will deliver sustainable local online communication with an acceptable framework of ownership, in sufficient density to help compensate for the current inadequacy of communication channels at local level.

read more »

Organise social reporters? Up to a point.

I’m delighted that the idea of social reporting, which I first floated a couple of years ago,  is taking off without much promotion from me. Maybe there’s something in it. My friend Paul Henderson of Ruralnet came up with this admirably brief definition, applauded by Nancy White, and Bev Trayner has posted a thoughtful analysis of the role, about which more later. read more »

Socialreporting an event – the inside story

The 2gether08 Festival of social innovation, media and general good stuff, held in London last month, gave me a terrific opportunity to try some concentrated social reporting, and learn what an extraordinary team effort and mix of tools it takes to make it work well.

I ended up managing a mix of blogging, video, social networking, and Twittering before, at and after the event, linked to some lightweight webcasting.

The whole experience gives me some confidence that there is plenty more to do in blending online and offline sociability and creativity … but before I get too carried away I should reflect on the particular circumstances and happenchances that made it relatively easy and a lot of fun.

The initial basis for success was having event curator Steve Moore as a client, and Channel 4 behind him as main sponsor.

Eight weeks before the gig Steve said: “I’ll pay you for 2-3 days a week – create a website and whatever’s necessary. I trust you to do the right thing”.

At that stage there was a venue, the former Rochelle School in Shoreditch, event organisers Germination, main sponsor Channel 4 … and a rather sketchy programme.

Steve’s idea was to recruit some high profile speakers, then take an open space approach to the rest of the programme and invite participants to pitch their ideas for sessions. It seemed possible in the time only because of the range of contacts Steve has developed over the past few years in the policy and social innovation field, around a range of smaller Policy Unplugged events. Channel 4 and their £50 million 4IP fund were also a big draw. I knew what magic Germination could manage, after doing some social reporting at SHINE, the event they organised for social entrepreneurs.

The website was fairly easy. I introduced Roy Charles, Steve’s partner, to Simon Berry of Ruralnet, whose team have spent the past year or so re-inventing their online services to provide social enterprises and nonprofits with cost-effective tailored systems using a mix of Web 2.0 tools. I was confident Duncan Arrow and Paul Henderson could do what we needed on their WordPress MU system (which also hosts this blog).

Steve had set up a 2gether 08 page in Facebook as a first step to building our Festival community, and we used Eventbrite for registration. Those gave us easy ways to promote, sell tickets and provide updates.

But what else? I was looking around for a social networking system to add to the main site when Steve asked me to step in for him and do a presentation at Geekyoto. I mentioned this to the audience, and Gavin Bell came up with a recommendation for Crowdvine. A few emails and a call to Tony Stubblebine in California confirmed it would do what we needed.

A Twitter account was essential because that’s where a lot of our participants would be chatting. Once that was in place I felt we were ready to go. Steve had lined up Channel 4 execs and some main speakers for pre-event videos and the buzz was building. It seemed that we just needed to keep feeding the blog, facilitating Crowdvine, building the programme, and all would be well.

(At this point I should say I still don’t understand quite how the organising team of Safiya Ahmed, working with Steve, Jess Tyrrell, Sam Beinhacker, Lizzie Ostrom and their colleagues at Gemination managed to create the programme. People were pitching ideas, Steve was calling his contacts, spaces in the school were being juggled. Somehow it ended up like this on the day. That was in addition to getting marquees erected, and the 19th century school building rigged for internal video relays. Quite amazing. I had the easy job).

Then less than a week before the event I heard via Paul Henderson about media production specialist Richard Jolly doing some webcasting at Belfast Barcamp with lightweight kit and Mogulus. I doubted if we could do anything in the time available … but Richard jumped at the chance to come over to 2gether08 and cover two of the main rooms. In one he had to set up his own kit, in the other his broadcast experience enabled him to link up with the A/V production team.

Result: live webcasts during the two days of the Festival, and an archive of content.

Here’s my reflection on the people and tools we needed to make all this work.

The participants. It was possible to create a rapid online buzz around 2gether08 because most people were very capable online, and many knew each other. Different media tribes maybe, but plenty of cross-overs. We trusted that if we provided linked flexible physical and virtual places, then they would make it work … and they did.

The organising team. Steve brought together a group of people who could work with creative chaos: a mix of some essential structure, and a lot working with opportunities as they arose. As well as the core team, we had champions for each of the main topic areas. Was there a project manager? I’m still not sure …

The partners. As you can see from the logos on the website we had over 20 partners who helped promote the event, develop sessions and recommend contributors.

A social reporter. I would say this wouldn’t I …. but just as someone has to host the event and make sure all the pieces come together, so it is necessary to do the same online. Whoever does that – and whatever you call them – has to create some content, facilitate others, configure and join up the tools.

The technical team. Duncan Arrow and colleagues at Ruralnet were brilliant in their rapid response to requests for tweaks to the blog, and other advice.

Internal communications. Steve set up a space on the Policy Unplugged Basecamp site for team messaging and documents, and also an “ideas farm” where people could pitch their proposals for sessions.

Registration. We used Eventbrite which does the job of selling tickets, keeping track of who is coming, and sending them updates.

Facebook. Creating a group or page is great way to invite a lot of people to the show, and ask them to invite their friends. However, it isn’t particularly useful for building a community, so you need other tools.

The main website. We used a WordPress blog with a magazine theme, customised by Duncan Arrow as we went along. We were able to post video easily, and pull in feeds from Crowdvine and Twitter as you can see on the home page. We created some static pages for About, the Schedule etc, and linked to the Crowdvine networking site. We gave all main contributors the opportunity to blog, and a few did. However, it is probably unrealistic to expect busy people to create well-crafted content on a blog. If they are bloggers they’ll prefer to use their own, if they aren’t it can be a big step to use a new system and produce something in an appropriate style.

Social networking. Crowdvine seemed to work well for participants. Although people had to register there as well as with Eventbrite, it was pretty simple. Once participants had filled in a profile and answered simple questions, the system created a cloud of tags to help people find others with similar interests. They could link to friends, indicate they wanted to meet, create blog posts or comment, and build a personal schedule for the event. We left registration open, so we did get some non-paying participants. We hope they’ll be keen to sign up for the full show next year. A number of people said they felt that by using Crowdvine they were at the event before it started.

Twitter. I created a 2gether08 account and used that to send out updates. We asked anyone tweeting about the event to include “2gether08” in their message, and then used Twitter search to pull these together. We were then able to feed all messages into the blog.

Video. I used a tape digicam with tripod and (mostly) external mic to do main interviews before the event – like this one of Matt Locke. One the day I used a small Sanyo Xacti – as in this interview with Tom Watson MP. I also used a Nokia N82 phone and Qik to stream video instantly to the web – examples here and here. By creating an event page we were able to capture video produced by other Qikkers (thanks to Lloyd Davis, Paul Henderson, Darragh Doyle, Jason Hall). Video could be seen there, and also embedded in the blog. I’m a big fan of Qik. The only limitation is the quality of audio possible from a phone.

Webcasting. Richard Jolly did an extraordinary job at very short notice which meant that people could follow the main 2gether08 sessions online, and chat simultaneously using the Mogulus channel. This produced yet more Twittering, and “wish I were there” messages. Afterwards we had a stack of tapes and disks, which my son Dan edited and posted to blip.tv. I’m still in process of captioning and sorting out thumbnails. (I should add that Dan acts as my personal tech support team – every social reporter needs one).

In retrospect, did we need all the tools? Probably, because they all fulfilled different functions. Could it be done with one comprehensive website? I don’t know, but will be investigating further with Jess Tyrrell. Jess and the Germination team had to cope with the back-end of integrating different tools, and that wasn’t easy. Jess told me:

From where I’m looking, I think that both Crowdvine and Eventbrite have their limitations – principally that Eventbrite is quite difficult on the list segmentation – it doesn’t do very well in getting us a comprehensive list of attendees broken down into ticket types as well as being able to list guests (we had problems with both 2gether and SHINE), and Crowdvine’s integration with our main site was frustrating – mainly that we had to duplicate the list of speakers on the main site to show the extent of the programme which didn’t come across as well as we needed it to on Crowdvine.  It meant A LOT more work and duplication – something that really an integrated system should get rid of by amalgamating information.

Jess pointed me at http://www.amiando.com, which will be one of the systems I’ll be looking at. I’m not sure yet how effective this or other integrated systems will be an on the blogging and social networking.

What does it cost? Not as much as you might think on the technical side, because many of the tools are free. However, I did find I was spending more time than anticipated before the event, and I’m sure others in the team did too. Probably our faults to an extend, as we got caught up in the excitement … but I would be wary of taking on a similar job without the reasonable time budget and technical support that we had for 2gether08. Video, in particular, is time-consuming if you have to set up the interview and then edit, compress, upload and create a blog post.

What didn’t work? I thought we might do a “backstage” blog as well as the main one, where the organising team could give participants a foretaste of the event. There are a few items there, but we were all too busy, and one blog was enough. As I’ve mentioned above, it proved unrealistic to expect speakers and partners to blog about their contributions before the event. However, people were very happy to give video interviews, and I think they were worth the time and effort.

I’m really grateful to Darragh and others who did some additional social reporting on the day, and next time around I would spend more time in planning how we could best operate as a reporting team. I think that in order to cover an event really well you need three or four people. I spent a lot of time on the day looking for interviews and processing video, which meant I couldn’t attend many sessions. It might be possible to encourage participants to create more online on the day … but that can be a distraction from the real business of listening and talking and being, ahem, 2gether.

What’s next? I know Steve is abuzz with ideas for more 2gethering, and I hope to play a part. Otherwise I’m looking for other clients who want to enhance their events with some social reporting, and maybe learn how to do some of it themselves.

I’m really conscious that what I’m calling social reporting is a generalist mashup of skills that others are deploying in greater depth as community managers, facilitators, technology stewards and bloggers. So mostly I’ll be looking out for other people in the business who are prepared to share their experience of these new roles … like Nick Booth, David Briggs, Steve Bridger, Steve Dale, Lloyd Davis, Darragh Doyle, Jemima Gibbons, Ed Mitchell, Bev Trayner, and Tim Davies who has produced some excellent one-sheet guides to some of the tools we used at 2gether08. Do you know any other social reporters?

Main online tools for 2gether08

Blog items about the event

Social reporting

Capturing Stuff, Conversations and Stories

A round of social reporting at conferences and other events leaves me with a simple classification for the content I may capture or create: there’s Stuff, Conversations, and Stories.

Stuff is Powerpoints, papers, speeches. It is delivered, usually from a platform, by Important People.

Conversations are what happens in the breaks between Stuff, or in small groups if the event is Open Space, Unconference, Barcamp or similar setup where participants are considered important people too.

Stories are the interesting bits you may remember from Stuff, and are also conversations that you wish to retell to other people.

Stories may also be constructed by hard-working social reporters after listening to Stuff and conversation,  for those not attending. These may or may not be the same stories participants tell each other.

The DC10plus conference about digital inclusion, which I blogged here with Dave Briggs, definitely had plenty of Stuff, and we also managed to capture conversations at coffee and lunch.

By contrast the Shine conference, and two Ideas days that I helped record for the Innovation Exchange – here and here – were designed to generate lots of conversations. Everyone  had a chance to tell their stories, and then talk to each other. In this case the stories were about helping older people with independent living, and excluded young people.

At 2gether08, which happens next week, the event has been designed partly by the organising team, and partly by those attending. As you’ll from the main site, and our networking space, there are already plenty of stories and conversation around. We’ll be using a whole range of methods to capture what happens on the two days.

I’m using pre-event interviews like this one with Tracey Todhunter to help her and others create a really good story: how social media can help communities share ideas on tackling climate change.

So what’s the most useful role for the social reporter on these different occasions?

I don’t think there’s much additional value in capturing Stuff. That can easily be published online as papers, slide shows, webcasts or podcasts. It doesn’t require much reporting skill.

On the other hand, I’ve found that most speakers are happy to provide a short video interview summarising their key points. This makes it easier for the reporter to turn Stuff into a Story if they ask sensible  questions, pull out some good quotes, and add some context for a blog post.

Capturing conversation is a bit more challenging. I’ve been using a Nokia 82 phone and Qik a lot for that, as you can see here with the Innovation Exchange and here at the Ruralnet Collaborate 2008 event.

I have found it much easier, holding a small phone, to say to people “that sounds interesting, would you mind if I captured some of what you are saying?” In some cases I’ve found it can add to the conversation, because people begin to tell stories to each other.

Good reporters have always found and developed stories that help people make sense of the world … and of course, bad reporters have just made up stories. How can social reporters help people have better conversations, and create the stories that they want to be part of?

All posts events

Socialreporting at Shine

This weekend I’m at the Shine Unconference in London – blogging, shooting some video, and generally having a great time in conversation with social entrepreneurs and every type of innovator you might hope to meet. The photo show Alberto Nardelli explaining the UnltdWorld social network, and you can see it is a wonderfully informal environment at The Bargehouse on the South Bank. read more »

Reflections on event socialreporting

One of my ideas for social reporting is to add some buzz to events by videoblogging and other ways of amplifying conversations – so it was great to get a job from the organiser of the National Digital Inclusion Conference to do just that. I was terrifically grateful that Dave Briggs could join me, because it turned out to be quite challenging on several fronts. You can read Dave’s report here, and some comments on our efforts from Shane McCracken here. Dave and I recorded our own summing up on the day.

As Dave explains, we set up a WordPress blog, and the friendly people at Qik also created an event page so I could stream video from my Nokia N82.

Our brief (we were being paid) was pretty open: capture some informal video to complement the webcasts of presentations that public-i were doing.

The main challenge was that it was a conventional event format: presentations, coffee breaks and break-out sessions, attended mainly by public sector staff who did not expect to have video cameras thrust into their face. I thought that people were pretty responsive in the circumstances … but it is difficult to get good audio in a noisy room, and you lose the moment if you take off into corridors.

This means there’s a great temptation to record interview with exhibitors when everyone else is off being Powerpointed. Dave livened that up by recording me trying some disabling gloves at one of the most interesting stands that simulated various forms of disability.

Maybe we could have produced more interesting content if we had aimed to create some narrative from the conference … but it is difficult to do that at the same time as editing video and trying to line up the next opportunity. To do full coverage it really needs a team of three: one writer, one video blogger, and one person editing and uploading. Next week we’ll have content from public-i, and at that stage it may be worth taking more quotes from the video and weaving in into other content, including presentations and webcasts. Some people are having trouble with the videos, and I think I need to embed a different Flash player.

The main lesson for me is that good socialreporting at events needs to be designed in to the format: clear ideas of what you are trying to achieve, for whom, with logistics to match. It doesn’t work too well as an add-on. But then, you can’t design it in until you have a few examples to show organisers … so thanks again to Stephen Hilton for lining up the opportunity, and the rest of the DC10plus organisers for taking a chance.

The following day I was socialreporting at a Festival of Ideas for the Innovation Exchange, which was a less formal occasion. More on that later.

All posts

Finding a second voice

I already have a blog, which I’ve been writing since 2003. So why  start another one? Partly because Designing for Civil Society feels a bit limiting; I do write a lot there about nonprofits, community engagement, e-democracy and the like, but I’m now more  interested in the way social media is changing how we organise, and the new roles associated with that. Social reporter is a bit crisper than Design-er for Civil Society.

It’s also about having a second voice – but as this story illustrates, that can bring risks.

The other day Dave Briggs spotted a blog called The UK Libertarian. It had one post which was a rant again government spending and civil servants. The blogger wrote:

I’ve kept this blog anonymous so that I can shout out what I think, and I want you to shout right back at me.

What he didn’t realise was that his Libertarian identify was easy to find because it was part of the Blogger profile of Josh March, who writes a blog about PR and social media called Social Marketing Strategy by Joshua. Josh was outed, and after I alerted him to Dave’s post a lengthy discussion followed about the pros and cons of anonymity. Josh didn’t deny the views in UK Libertarian – just said he wanted to keep them distinct from his  business persona. He’s now taken the blog down, and Dave generously removed quotes from his blog, but you can see the discussion in comments here.

I understand Josh’s desire for another voice (though I don’t agree with the views he expressed).  I do agree with Dave Briggs on anonymity, and with Paul Caplan who says that the blog conversation carries more authenticity because contributors are identified.

By the way, you can see here how Designing for Civil Society got its name – from someone else’s workshop. This one’s all mine, for what it’s worth, and I am here.

How the social reporter idea started

I started thinking back in October 2006 about “social reporter” as a useful label for what I might do with a mix of social media tools and face-to-face activities.

As a role social reporter could sit with knowledge activist, technology steward, collaboration co-ordinator as a description for someone exploring how to do good stuff with new stuff. It also appealed to me as a former newspaper reporter now interested in how professionals and amateurs (or pro-ams) could work together on a new kind of news – what Jeff Jarvis, Charlie Beckett and others call networked journalism.

read more »